From the performance viewpoint, the SiS looks more attractive, but here everything depends on a manufacturer. As for differences between these chipsets, I think they are not critical. And I can’t say they are wrong. There is even an AGP Pro connector on it. That is why the tests will demonstrate the performance of exactly the chipset rather than of the board.
|Date Added:||2 August 2018|
|File Size:||31.26 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Test results Well, the Ali’s chipset loses in all tests, regardless of the memory type used.
As for the board, there is also nothing bad that we could say about it. But as a matter of fact, it has an older architecture than the SiS – almost every manufacturer has refused a PCI bus as a connecting link between aasus. There is even an AGP Pro connector on it. The product is not sensational, but its characteristics are rather good: The low-level tus266 of the memory subsystem efficiency – Cachemem – reveals the reasons.
From the performance viewpoint, the SiS looks more attractive, but here everything depends on a manufacturer. Write a comment below. Sandy Bridge Trying out the new method.
ASUS TUA – Motherboard – ATX – ALADDiN-Pro 5T – Socket – UDMA at Backoffice
As for differences between these chipsets, I think they are not critical. Well, in this case no changes were noticed, that tua26 why we have taken old results for three boards from the review mentioned above.
Besides, there is a definite group of users who are guided by exactly the name of a manufacturer rather than by the speed and accessories of a board. ASUS is known as a company that squeezes out a chipset to get the highest performance possible. BioShock Infinite and Metro: Video asu Video cards: What other attractive features does this chipset have?
ASUS TUA266 – motherboard – ATX – Socket 370 – ALADDiN-Pro 5T Series
The chipset manufacturers are well aware of it and do not place production of this chipsets into the first position. Taking these facts into consideration I assume that today we have gathered all chipsets which will ever be released for the Socket platform. And you will hardly face any problems caused by usage of one chipset instead of another.
Well, it’s a Tualatin support. The performance is not striking. The prices are given for the Eastern Europe.
And I can’t say they are wrong. On the other hand, the price difference between PC and PC may be smoothed out very soon. That is why the tests will demonstrate the performance of exactly the chipset rather than of the board. Consumed Power, Energy Consumption: The sound subsystem is, however, absent.